National Alliance on Mental Illness
|
|
|
Children's News
Supporting Schools and Communities in Breaking the Prison Pipeline: A Guide to Emerging and Promising Crisis Intervention Programs for YouthThis guide introduces the reader to crisis intervention programs for youth, and is based on the experiences of three communities where these programs are emerging. http://www.nami.org/template.cfm?template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=73479&lstid=275
TeenScreenAs many of you
are aware, there has been a fair amount of anti-MH screening and anti-child
psychiatry activity since the release of the President’s New Freedom
Commission report (NFC), which called for schools to play a larger role in the
early identification of mental illnesses in children, and featured the Columbia
University TeenScreen program as a model program. There has been an
incredible amount of misinformation that has circulated about both what the NFC
report calls for and about the TeenScreen program. Below is a
one-page document that NAMI developed to help set the record straight about the
NFC report and the Columbia University TeenScreen program. I hope that you
find the attached document helpful as you receive emails or inquries. The
reality is that we do a very poor job in this country of identifying children
and adolescents with mental illnesses until they have lost critical
developmental years to undiagnosed and untreated mental illnesses or have
suffered unnecessary tragedies. MH Screening is just one approach to help
identify youth that may need mental health services.
NAMI Responds to Attacks on Mental Health Screening and President Bush’s New Freedom Commission Report NAMI is extremely pleased that Goal 4 of President Bush’s New Freedom Commission report (NFC) on mental health calls for mental health screening. Here is the goal and recommendations:
The NFC report identified the Columbia University TeenScreen Program as a model program. The TeenScreen program is designed to identify youth that may be at risk for suicide or suffering from an untreated mental illness and links those youth with a mental health professional for an appropriate evaluation. The release of the NFC report resulted in some groups attacking Goal 4 of the report and the TeenScreen program. The groups that have organized these attacks have attacked psychiatry for years. They are using gross distortions about the TeenScreen program and the NFC report to build support in opposition to screening. Why is mental health screening so important? To date, our nation has failed to identify the overwhelming majority of children and adolescents living with mental illnesses.
What are the most serious consequences of untreated mental illnesses in children and adolescents?
What are the anti-screening and anti-psychiatry groups saying about TeenScreen and the NFC report? These groups claim that the federal government is calling for mandatory, universal mental health screening without parental consent of all of our nation’s children. These groups claim that screening leads to labeling children and forcing them onto medications. They also claim a conspiracy between the Bush administration, organized psychiatry and the pharmaceutical industry to get as many children as possible onto psychotropic medications. They claim that the TeenScreen program does not require parental consent, leads to children being inappropriately diagnosed and results in children improperly being placed on psychotropic medications. These campaigns of misinformation are designed to stir up fear, confusion and outrage. They certainly drive up stigma. What is the truth about the TeenScreen program and Goal 4 of the NFC report? No one is calling for mandatory mental health screening without parental consent. Not the TeenScreen program, not President Bush, not the NFC report, not mental health advocates – no one. And, a simple reading of the NFC report makes that fact clear. In fact, the report calls for parental involvement and collaboration in screening and early identification. Here are several quotes from Goal 4 of the report:
Contrary to the claims of those attacking the TeenScreen program, the TeenScreen program requires parental consent and teen assent to participate before any screening can be done. It does not provide a diagnosis nor does the screening result in a child receiving psychotropic medication. Instead, it identifies teens that may be at risk and works with the family to link them with a mental health professional for an evaluation. What can NAMI leaders and families do to set the record straight on mental health screening?
June 2006
November 2006
|